|"It is more desirable, effective and
economical to prevent contamination of drinking
water supplies than to pay for treatment, or to clean up an already-polluted source."
(Source: "Children and Drinking Water Standards." EPA, December 1999.)
|WHO ARE WE?||NEWS|
was formed to give the people a direct voice in choosing the source of
our future drinking water. Specifically, we
do not believe the Willamette River is an appropriate source until it
is cleaned up (see EPA quote above). There are better alternatives. In
four cities, CFSW sponsored initiative
to amend the charters in those cities to require a vote of the people
before using the Willamette for drinking water. All initiatives passed
by wide margins. Tualatin
Valley Water District followed suit by passing a similar ordnance.
However, the battle is not yet won.
Read more about our history and accomplishments here.
Do you live in the Tualatin Valley Water District?
See MAP here.
"Let the people decide!"
What does CFSW advocate?
In general, we support using water from the purest source available and creating a strong water conservation program. To these ends:
1. We support the continued use of Portland's pristine Bull Run water as the primary source for Tualatin Valley Water District customers because Bull Run is purest source available.
The District's claim that Portland's water is too expensive does not justify using a less pure source, whether it be the Willamette or Hagg Lake. Portland's wholesale rates are calculated using standard methods approved by the American Water Works Association (as the District admits). They are lower than Seattle's wholesale rates. EPA says using the best water source available is "more desirable, effective and economical" than paying for treatment to clean up an already polluted source. [Children and Drinking Water Standards; EPA, December 1999]
2. We will accept the raising of Scoggins Dam and Hagg Lake to supplement Portland's Bull Run water.
If the capacity of the Washington County Supply line from Bull Run for TVWD is tapped out (42.3 mgd), then the second best choice as a supplemental supply is Hagg Lake. Unlike Bull Run that is closed to public access, Hagg Lake is a recreational lake in a county park visited by over 600,000 people annually. Because of man-made pollution like combustion products from outboard motors, pesticides from local agriculture, and waste from human visitors, this water does not measure up to the purity of Bull Run water but is a better water source than the Willamette. We prefer to maximize the use of Bull Run water, and use Hagg Lake water as a supplemental source only.
3. We oppose the use of Willamette River water until the river is clean and free of toxins and then only if approved by the District's voters.
The Willamette drains 12,000 square miles of forest, agricultural and urban land accumulating pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, animal residue, treated and untreated sewage, and general urban runoff. EPA regulates a small subset of these chemicals, often with limits much more permissive than allowed by the European Union or recommended by the World Health Organization. Recent studies indicate many unregulated substances commonly present in polluted rivers can have significant harmful effects at very low concentrations. Because long-term effects of some of these substances are unknown, EPA recommends using the cleanest available source water. The District's customers have indicated by a five-to-one margin that they prefer Bull Run water to Willamette water. The District should be required to get the approval of its customers before spending any money on Willamette source projects.
4. We support storing water in an underground aquifer when water is plentiful in the winter and spring to help meet high summer peak demand, and for emergency use.
Many cities are using Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) because it is a low-cost way to store a large volume of water during winter months for use during the dry summer months when customer peak demand is high.. It also provides a cushion in case of temporary loss of a supply system component.
5. We support water conservation measures to reduce the need for costly expansion of water source facilities.
As for most natural resource needs, the last increment is the most costly. Capital expenses for new sources, pipelines, and treatment add fixed cost to the water system. Wasteful use of water is especially offensive. We favor a graduated rate structure, incentives to replace old wasteful fixtures, and encouragement of efficient irrigation systems.
6. Regardless of water source, we oppose privatization or private operation of a water treatment plant or any water supply component.
The track record of private water system owners and operators provides ample reason for keeping this critical piece of our infrastructure in public hands.
|Last updated 1/7/13||CFSW
believes that the information we present to the public is accurate and
documentable. If you have reason to believe any of the information on
this web site is not accurate, and can provide evidence to support your
contention, let us know. We will review all such information and
correct any information we believe to be inaccurate. Any such
submissions should be sent to